12/13/2005

And The Sonogram Says......

That there's a baby in there!

Well, of course there IS a baby in there, a perfectly healthy baby who weighs around 6.5 lbs and who apparently has her bags packed and is quite ready to go. By this I mean she is totally head down and "engaged", she's facing to my right, and my cervix is starting to thin. So I could conceivably go into labour at any time on my own, and before my scheduled C-Section date, but I would really prefer she stays put until at least the first week in January. As far as how engaged her little head is, well we won't be able to tell that until my next appt where I will get to have another dreaded "internal"....OUCH! But her head is pressing against the cervix and while the tech couldn't tell exactly how much my cervix had thinned, it was, according to her, "thinning".

This is a first for me as all of my other babies have either been breech (butt first) or transverse (lying side to side) and still been "floating" meaning that the baby had not descended into the birth canal.

And even if I do go into labour on my own, I'm still having a C-Section as the risks of a uterine rupture are very high for someone who has already had three C-Sections. In the past I've always gone into labour on my own but it's never progressed. And just watch, this will be the one time where things happen really fast and my body does what it's supposed to but just due to my previous history, I'll still have a C-Section. That would just be my luck. But, having a healthy baby with as little risk as possible is the goal. And having a C-Section doesn't bother me at all. I know what to expect and I'm trying to be as prepared for dealing with all that again, as much as I can.

So her descent into the birth canal explains why I am so uncomfortable and why I am feeling so much pressure and pain in the general area she happens to be residing in.

The tech who did the sonogram said she would be surprised if Gidget were huge once she makes her grand entrance, but estimates maybe 8lbs, possibly slightly over if she goes all the way to my scheduled date. I was relieved to hear it didn't appear she was anywhere near as large as I thought she is. She is a bit larger than average for nearing 35 weeks gestation, but not off the chart. Just the same, I think I'm stocking up on larger diapers. Newborn size only goes to between 9-10lbs.

The tech also said she would be surprised if I made it to my scheduled C-Section date. Yikes.

Alas, because Gidget is settled so far down, we were unable to tell how much hair she has. And there are also no pics from the session this time as Gidget has gotten far too big to have anything come out that's recognizable.

So, from here on out, I'm going to get as much done as I can in the way of final preparations. Gotta get the car seat all buckled into the car, my hospital bags packed, choose a breast pump once and for all, and make sure any other odds and ends that we've not taken care of have been sorted.

Wow, this is really coming up fast. I had expected these last weeks to sort of drag by, but that's not the case.

Now, Gidget my darling, you must stay put until the first of the year. Just stay there. It's nice and warm inside and believe me, it's so cold out here now. Gonna get down to -15F below 0 tonight with the wind chill. Otherwise it will be a balmy 0F without the windchill. And you staying put like a good girl means mum and dad have a bit more time to get ready for you....i.e.; buy you more stuff! And that's always a good thing.

But you also need to stay put because I said so! And that's all there is to that!

11 Comments:

At 12/13/2005 5:15 PM, Blogger Christina said...

and the big question... is she bald!!! :)

 
At 12/13/2005 5:30 PM, Blogger G & Auds said...

Re-read the post *lol* She is too far down and too large at this point to tell. Her head is completely squished against my cervix to tell what all is up there. *lol*

I dunno. I can't see her bucking the bald-baby trend. But only time will tell.

Just the same, maybe I better get some little hair thingy's....just in case. *lol*

 
At 12/14/2005 8:16 AM, Blogger marlene said...

My prediction is that lil miss gidgy will want out by December 31st.

Does that get you a tax deduction? :o)

 
At 12/14/2005 10:13 AM, Blogger G & Auds said...

Well if she can't hold on and does show up before the first of the year, then yes she'll be our little tax deduction. But I am really praying and hoping that she stays put. However, my dear mom emailed me yesterday and my siblings and I were always early....

"And you think she’s going to stay put because you said so? Let’s see, you were supposed to get here November 28, and showed up November 14 (weighing 5 lb 13 oz and doing quite well, thank you), D was supposed to get here August 8 and arrived July 3 at 6 lbs 3 oz, A was supposed to be April 21 and showed up April 9 at 7 lbs 7 oz, and J, the only one of my children to have the courtesy and kindness to him mum to be born NOT in the middle of the night, was supposed to be February 15 and arrived January 22 at 6 lbs 4 oz and 21.5” tall. They “cook” as long as they’re supposed to and then they show up. The end."

And I have always gone a week or two early in the past, with the exception of the twins who were 6-7 weeks early...so it's anyone's guess when I'll pop. I'm hoping she's content where she is till my scheduled date.

But I was reading last night about the onset of labour from the time the head is engaged (of course in all of these, the baby head was fully engaged and we don't know just how engaged Gidget's head IS) is relatively short.

So that means I'd best get off my bum, get all those lovely little pink outfits washed and put away, my hospital bags packed, the car seat hooked up in the car, my breast pump bought (and do you think my darling husband ever ended up consenting to letting me try the pump out on him! HA! Not a chance!) and everything else taken care of.

So I don't know why I'm still sitting here on my big butt.

 
At 12/14/2005 10:16 AM, Blogger G & Auds said...

P.S. Does this mean ya'll are stating the "official baby arrival pool" ? *lol*

If so, remember that my original due date isn't until 1/21/06!

And you all got a head start anyhow because I told you what the tech estimates her CURRENT weight at, 6.5 lbs.

Let the bets begin!!!!!

 
At 12/14/2005 10:27 AM, Blogger marlene said...

7 lbs. 2 oz.!!!

December 31st!!!!

The bet is ON!!

 
At 12/14/2005 10:28 AM, Blogger marlene said...

7 lbs. 2 oz.

December 31st

BALD

Let the bets begin!!!

 
At 12/14/2005 11:10 AM, Blogger Rebecca Chapman said...

you may not have ever had babies with a full head of hair, but what is the history in G's family? Did he have hair when he was born?

here's hoping she stays put for a couple more weeks at least.

 
At 12/14/2005 11:58 AM, Blogger G & Auds said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 12/14/2005 12:34 PM, Blogger G & Auds said...

Well Reba (oh by the way, got your Christmas card and I LOVE IT! What a beautiful photo of you and your "kids"....I can't believe how big they are! Thank you so much for including us!)....as far as G's family, I'd really love to be able to tell you who, out of his 3 brothers and himself had hair and who didn't.

I have seen one tiny photograph of Gareth when he was an infant and I recall he had some hair, but I don't think there was a lot. However I do know he was a HUGE baby! I believe he was 10+lbs!!!! And his Mum was a tiny petite thing, about 4'10 (someone correct me if I'm wrong) I believe. All I can say is OUCH!!!!!

So I guess I am going to be a pest and email the brothers, Tim, Jim and Kim and ask them about whether they recall whether they were hairy or not!

*lol*

Gee, I should really score some points this time around.

Auds

 
At 12/14/2005 1:31 PM, Blogger Christina said...

ah... I read the post too fast, while getting ready to Christmas shop with hubby.. you know how I love to shop with him! Anyway.. I put my guess on the other post! :)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home